The Many Facets of Glaucoma

Dr. Simon Skalicky and Clin A/Prof Andrew White

Glaukos iStent
Evolving research into glaucoma is improving diagnosis and management for our glaucoma patients.

Significant advances in glaucoma detection and management during 2016 included new dietary advice, the use of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCT-A) for glaucoma diagnosis, an explosion of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) technology, as well as novel and exciting methods of detecting glaucomatous visual dysfunction. These findings will drive our work in 2017 and beyond.

Dietary Advice

One of the more headline grabbing studies conducted during 2016 came from the long running ‘Nurses Health Study’, which suggested a diet rich in nitrates (found in green leafy vegetables), was protective against glaucomatous vision loss. This was especially true for paracentral scotomas, the most functional vision threatening forms of glaucomatous visual field loss. This effect was dose dependent and seemed to confer a 20-30 per cent decrease in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) risk.1 Thus it makes sense to advise a diet rich in nitrates and antioxidants for our patients in order to reduce the risk of vision threatening glaucomatous visual field loss.

Optic Nerve/Retinal Imaging and Glaucoma

OCT-A is a relatively new non-invasive method to measure microcirculation in various retinal layers separately. With wide reaching applications across ocular diagnostics, it has specific application to glaucoma in the evaluation of the peripapillary microvasculature. When normal eyes are compared to glaucomatous eyes, peripapillary microvascular dropout is associated with glaucomatous damage.2-4 Specific risk factors for microvascular dropout include choroidal thinning, reduced diastolic blood pressure and lamina cribrosa defects.5 Localised microvascular dropout is often adjacent to the lamina cribrosa defect.6 It appears that the degree of vascular dropout is proportional to the severity of glaucomatous visual field loss7 and may be more closely correlated to visual field loss severity than retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thinning measured by non-angiographic OCT.8Eyes diagnosed with ocular hypertension (raised intraocular pressure (IOP) with healthy-appearing optic nerves demonstrate reduced peripapillary microvascular perfusion, indicating OCT-A may detect very early, previously unrecognised glaucomatous damage. Reduced-IOP improved peripapillary microvascular perfusion, indicates a reversible pathological mechanism, at least early in the disease course.9

In non-angiographic OCT, significant progress was made refining both Fourier-domain10 and Spectral-domain11,12 OCT in structural disc diagnosis in glaucoma, with excellent test-retest repeatability, was reported in Spectral-domain OCT.13 With increasing resolution of technology, new layers can be more finely discriminated such as the macular RNFL. The macular RNFL thickness appears as good as macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) and circumpapillary RNFL thickness measurements in discriminating between glaucomatous eyes and controls.14

The ganglion cell layer complex is gaining importance in glaucoma monitoring. Evaluating OCT parameters in high myopes can be challenging, as myopia can cause similar OCT-detected changes as glaucoma. However measuring asymmetry of the GCC differen,ce across the temporal raphe appears to be more useful than other OCT parameters (e.g. peripapillary RNFL thickness) in distinguishing glaucomatous damage in high myopes.15 OCT progression analysis is limited by floor effects, in that once enough damage has occurred to the nerve, it is difficult to detect further progression due to the overall thinning, at which point visual field progression becomes much more useful. One study evaluating floor effects in OCT monitoring found that GCC measurements had fewer and later floor effects than the RNFL, indicating a greater utility of GCC than RNFL in moderate to advanced disease.16 GCC measurements were found to have greater ability to diagnose glaucoma accurately than functional visual tests (microperimetry and standard automated perimetry).17

Novel Means of Measuring Visual Function in Glaucoma

Last year a variety of novel ways to measure visual function in glaucoma were described, some of which show promise to complement, or one day, even replace visual field testing. The photopic negative response of the electroretinogram was evaluated as a quantitative metric of optic nerve function. Objective testing like this may have a vital role in future clinical studies evaluating new glaucoma therapies.18Tablet perimetry recorded using an Apple iPad appears to show great promise, with strong correlation to Humphrey field analysis and good test-retest reliability.19 Such technology may have a role in home perimetry or for remote or regional patients without access to specialized health care resources.

Quality of Life in Glaucoma

Our understanding of how glaucoma influences the daily quality of life (QoL) continues to grow. One unique study found that clinicians are still poor at discussing QoL implications of the disease with their patients, despite the importance of glaucoma’s influence on patients’ QoL.20 Driving impairment and motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) are a major consequence for patients with glaucoma influencing their independence of living. In a population-based Japanese study, several risk factors for MVAs were assessed in POAG patients; visual acuity in the worse eye was the strongest predictive factor.21 One cross-sectional study found contrast sensitivity, chromatic vision and reading ability to be worse in moderate POAG patients compared to early POAG patients, indicating impairment of a variety of visual functions as the disease progresses.22 A new computerised simulation test to identify the way in which glaucoma limits daily activities has been described, which may bridge the gap in patient understanding of how their visual impairment can influence daily life.23

Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery

MIGS, involving tiny microstents inserted into the trabecular meshwork and/or suprachoroidal space, continues to increase in scope and promise. MIGS appears increasingly likely to have a role in mainstream glaucoma therapy. Amid the hype there is confusion and controversy about which device is best and the role the myriad of new MIGS devices will play within current glaucoma therapies.

The COMPASS trial, evaluating the supraciliary (Cypass) microstent in glaucoma patients undergoing cataract surgery was evaluated in a randomized control trial (RCT) with two year follow up (n=505).24 Compared with the control group (patients undergoing cataract surgery alone), the Cypass resulted in lower IOP (7.4 v 5.4 mm Hg reduction) and medication use at 12 and 24 months. Some hypotony was reported but no vision-threatening microstent-related adverse events occurred.

The Hydrus microstent, inserted ab-interno into Schlemm’s canal, was compared to selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in POAG patients.25 Both reduced IOP, however Hydrus implantation significantly reduced medication dependence whereas SLT did not. The Hydrus however, had a greater complication rate, with some patients having a transient IOP spike or visual acuity reduction.

Several studies evaluated the iStent trabecular bypass stent (both the first generation iStent and second generation iStent inject) combined with cataract surgery. These found a decent response to the trabecular bypass in terms of reduction in IOP and number of medications used.26-28 As a stand-alone procedure in pseudophakic eyes, the iStent has a modest IOP reduction but does not alter the number of topical medications, indicating it may be more potent when combined with cataract surgery.29 In newly diagnosed patients with POAG, researchers compared two iStents inserted with topical prostaglandin monotherapy with a similar safety profile, and IOP reduction at three years follow up.30 The iStent inject was compared to the Trabecutome in a contralateral eye comparison study; both resulted in significant IOP lowering with no significant difference between treatment types.31

Several other devices are on the horizon and show great promise. For instance, the Xen subconjunctival implant is inserted trans-sclerally from an ab-interno approach. It is due to be released this year.

Lasers in Glaucoma

SLT is increasingly used in the treatment of open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension as a first line of therapy, in addition to drops, or to delay glaucoma filtration surgery.32 Research conducted last year challenged many of our beliefs about SLT. SLT is pro-inflammatory, and its efficacy is generally believed to be reduced by use of topical anti-inflammatory medication post-laser. However, De Keyser et al found that post-laser medication had no effect on pain, redness, cells in the anterior chamber or final IOP outcomes.33 SLT is typically performed by aiming the treatment directly onto the pigmented trabecular meshwork (TM) using a gonioscopic mirror. Curiously, a study by Geffen et al found that direct application to the limbal area without direct visualisation of the TM produced similar results to conventional treatment.34

SLT is frequently quoted to be less effective on subsequent treatments than primary treatment, yet new evidence from three separate population-based studies suggest repeat 360 degree SLT is as effective as initial 360 degree treatment.35-37 SLT appears to be effective even in eyes post-trabeculectomy.38 Pattern-scanning SLT, formed using the semi-automated Pascal laser, appears to have a similar safety and efficacy profile to the conventional SLT.39 In a case-controlled study involving 118 patients, SLT had similar efficacy in POAG as in primary angle closure (PAC)/primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) patients whose angles had been opened by laser iridotomies prior to SLT.40

Continuous transcleral cyclodiode laser to the ciliary body is often used for refractory glaucoma. Alternatives to the conventional cyclodiode laser were evaluated last year. Micropulse infrared laser shows promise as an alternative to traditional continuous wavelength delivery, and may display similar efficacy with reduced inflammation and hyptotony.41 High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an alternative ciliary body coagulation modality for IOP lowering and it appears to be safe and effective in two small consecutive studies.42, 43 Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation combined with cataract surgery is a good treatment option for patients with plateau iris syndrome.44

Angle Closure

PAC is a multifactorial disease associated with a combination of pupillary block, peripheral iris thickening, plateau iris and/or phacomorphic (lens-related) vault. Teasing out the various mechanisms that allows application of the correct treatment can be challenging clinically. A new automated method of classifying angle closure glaucoma mechanisms based on anterior-segment OCT was proposed, which may be more efficient and less user-dependent than traditional methods.45

The role of clear lens extraction in the management of PAC is as controversial as ever. However, some light has been shed on the issue with the publication of the EAGLE study in the Lancet in 2016.46

In one of the largest population based RCTs in the field of PAC, clear lens extraction (CLE) was evaluated in patients with PAC/PACG aged >50 years with IOP >30 mm Hg.

CLE showed greater efficacy and was more cost-effective than laser iridotomy, and is recommended by the authors as first line treatment instead of laser iridotomy. However, given the stringent inclusion criteria, the results cannot necessarily be extrapolated to all PAC/PACG patients.

Persistent angle closure following laser peripheral iridotomy is a common problem in clinical practice. Argon laser peripheral iridoplasty (ALPI) has a controversial role in opening the angle further in such patients, potentially allowing safe deferral of cataract surgery. In the IMPACT study the role of ALPI was evaluated in patients with persistent angle closure following iridotomy using swept-source anterior segment OCT.47 The study found that all angle parameters improved following ALPI, resulting in reduced maximal IOP and diurnal IOP fluctuations. However, ALPI appears to be less effective at IOP control than prostaglandin monotherapy in patients with persistent appositional angle closure following PI.48

A new formula was proposed predicting postoperative intraocular pressure after cataract surgery in PACG based on pre-cataract surgery IOP and anterior chamber depth.49 It show s reasonable predictive power.

Medical Therapies for Glaucoma

Since the advent of prostaglandin therapy for glaucoma in the early 90s, there has been no new class of drug to add to the armoury of glaucoma medications that is any better than what we currently have. This is despite some initial promise and a lot of scientific work for many potential target medications. Research is continuing on the Rho Kinase inhibitors and latanoprostene bunod as potential adjunct therapies. There may be a role for drugs such as trabedenoson, and Adenosine A1 receptor mimetic which seem to demonstrate a dose dependent and prolonged action in recently published Phase II studies.50

We have known for some time that adherence to glaucoma medications is very poor over time. Accordingly, there has been much work recently on depot preparations of IOP lowering agents. The most advanced of these technologies (in terms of progress through clinical trial) is bimatoprost slow release (SR) depot delivered into the eye. This is currently undergoing Phase III trials (ARTEMIS 1 and 2, ATHENA) in centres across Australia. Another biopolymer derived depot platform uses travoprost as the drug of choice and is currently undergoing a Phase II trial. There are a variety of biopolymer and nanoparticle derived technologies under development. While not specifically being developed for glaucoma, these could deliver depot glaucoma medications either inside or adjacent to the eye. Additionally, while collagen implants, punctal plugs and contact lenses impregnated with glaucoma medications have shown a modest effect on IOP, it is relatively early days with this sort of technology. Many of the medical device companies also have plans (but no trials) for drug eluting medical devices that may drain aqueous – in a similar way to a drainage tube or a MIGS device. This may involve wound healing modulators, neuroprotective agents or additional IOP lowering agents. There are also drug delivery canister devices for implantation in the eye under development. All of this suggests that the arena for medical therapy for glaucoma will move away from IOP lowering drops to depot preparations of some kind. It is too early to tell what the winning technologies will be.

Basic Science of Glaucoma

With the large multinational genetic consortiums such as NEIGHBOR and GLAUGEN studies as well as access to the genetic information collected as part of the Norfolk based EPIC study and locally based ANZRAG study, our understanding of the complex genetic interactions that form part of the pathogenesis of glaucoma continues to improve. Genome-wide associated studies identified three new genes associated with POAG51 and five with PAC.52 There has been additional work looking at how the genes associated with glaucoma interact with each other.53 This is an emerging field and as we map out the complex molecular pathways affected by glaucoma, we may be able to develop new and better-targeted therapies.

There is increasing evidence that vascular dysregulation, impaired metabolism and mitochondrial dysfunction play a role in glaucoma pathogenesis. Hypoxia may induce previously unexpected outcomes such as fibrosis in the trabecular meshwork, impairing aqueous outflow.54 A large genetic study looked at the role of mitochondrial genetic variations and mapped metabolic pathways, especially lipid and carbohydrate metabolism pathways.55 This exciting new field is rapidly opening potential therapeutic targets. Given the array of cardiovascular drugs already approved for use in these areas, the potential clinical translation into the treatment of glaucoma may be rapid indeed.

At present glaucomatous damage cannot be reversed, however some work this year showed great promise for this goal. Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) can be isolated from mice by a technique known as immunopanning. These ganglion cells were labelled and transplanted into living rats. Not only did the RGCs integrate appropriately into the host retina but they also responded to light and grew new axons heading towards the optic nerve head and connecting occasionally with deeper brain structures.56 If this can be developed further, perhaps recovery of glaucomatous damage could be within reach.

As usual, many studies ask more questions than they answer but the development of new technologies and therapeutic approaches as well as a greater understanding continues apace in 2017 and beyond.

Dr. Simon Skalicky, FRANZCO, PhD, BSc (Med), MPhil, MMed, MBBS (Hons 1) is a glaucoma and cataract subspecialist with posts at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital and Royal Melbourne Hospital. He is a Clinical Senior Lecturer at the University of Sydney and University of Melbourne. He is a federal Councillor and chair of the Ophthalmology Liaison Committee for Glaucoma Australia. Dr Skalicky gained subspecialist expertise in glaucoma and cataract surgery at Cambridge, United Kingdom. An advocate of evidence-based best practice, he is widely published and actively involved in training medical students, registrars and fellows. He consults privately at Eye Surgery Associates in East Melbourne, Malvern and Vermont South.

Clin A/Prof Andrew White B.Med.Sci(hons) MBBS PhD FRANZCO is a clinician scientist ophthalmologist at Westmead Hospital. His subspecialty interest is glaucoma. He was awarded First Class Honours in Medical Science in 1995 and a combined MBBS/PhD degree in 2002 from the University of Sydney. He also undertook research work at the Max Plank Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Gottingen, Germany and the State University of New York (SUNY) and the University of Cambridge. Clin A/Prof. White is a consultant ophthalmologist at Westmead Hospital in Sydney as well as private practice. He has research affiliations with the University of Sydney at both the Save Sight Institute and Westmead Institute for Medical Research where he runs a laboratory developing new treatments for glaucoma.

1. Kang JH, Willett WC, Rosner BA, Buys E, Wiggs JL and Pasquale LR. Association of Dietary Nitrate Intake With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Prospective Analysis From the Nurses’ Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016; 134: 294-303.
2. Rao HL, Kadambi SV, Weinreb RN, et al. Diagnostic ability of peripapillary vessel density measurements of optical coherence tomography angiography in primary open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016.
3. Lee EJ, Lee KM, Lee SH and Kim TW. OCT Angiography of the Peripapillary Retina in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57: 6265-70.
4. Lee EJ, Kim S, Hwang S, Han JC and Kee C. Microvascular Compromise Develops Following Nerve Fiber Layer Damage in Normal-Tension Glaucoma Without Choroidal Vasculature Involvement. J Glaucoma. 2016.
5. Suh MH, Zangwill LM, Manalastas PI, et al. Deep Retinal Layer Microvasculature Dropout Detected by the Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123: 2509-18.
6. Suh MH, Zangwill LM, Manalastas PI, et al. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density in Glaucomatous Eyes with Focal Lamina Cribrosa Defects. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123: 2309-17.
7. Yarmohammadi A, Zangwill LM, Diniz-Filho A, et al. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucoma Eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57: OCT451-9.
8. Yarmohammadi A, Zangwill LM, Diniz-Filho A, et al. Relationship between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density and Severity of Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123: 2498-508.
9. Hollo G. Influence of Large Intraocular Pressure Reduction on Peripapillary OCT Vessel Density in Ocular Hypertensive and Glaucoma Eyes. J Glaucoma. 2016.
10. Zhang X, Dastiridou A, Francis BA, et al. Baseline Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Structural Risk Factors for Visual Field Progression in the Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016; 172: 94-103.
11. Kim KE, Oh S, Jeoung JW, et al. Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Manifest Glaucoma: Its Additive Role in Structural Diagnosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016; 171: 18-26.
12. Fu L, Aspinall P, Bennett G, Magidson J and Tatham AJ. The Influence of Optical Coherence Tomography Measurements of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer on Decision-Making in Glaucoma Diagnosis. Curr Eye Res. 2016: 1-8.
13. Pearce JG and Maddess T. Inter-visit Test-Retest Variability of OCT in Glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 2016.
14. Kim HJ, Lee SY, Park KH, Kim DM and Jeoung JW. Glaucoma Diagnostic Ability of Layer-by-Layer Segmented Ganglion Cell Complex by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57: 4799-805.
15. Kim YK, Yoo BW, Jeoung JW, Kim HC, Kim HJ and Park KH. Glaucoma-Diagnostic Ability of Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Difference Across Temporal Raphe in Highly Myopic Eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57: 5856-63.
16. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Medeiros FA and Belghith A. Estimating OCT Structural Measurement Floors to Improve Detection of Progression In Advanced Glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016.
17. Rao HL, Hussain RS, Januwada M, et al. Structural and functional assessment of macula to diagnose glaucoma. Eye (Lond). 2016.
18. Wu Z, Hadoux X, Fan Gaskin JC, Sarossy MG and Crowston JG. Measuring the Photopic Negative Response: Viability of Skin Electrodes and Variability Across Disease Severities in Glaucoma. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016; 5: 13.
19. Kong YX, He M, Crowston JG and Vingrys AJ. A Comparison of Perimetric Results from a Tablet Perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016; 5: 2.
20. Sleath B, Sayner R, Vitko M, et al. Glaucoma patient-provider communication about vision quality-of-life. Patient Educ Couns. 2016.
21. Yuki K, Awano-Tanabe S, Ono T, et al. Risk Factors for Motor Vehicle Collisions in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0166943.
22. Bambo MP, Ferrandez B, Guerri N, et al. Evaluation of Contrast Sensitivity, Chromatic Vision, and Reading Ability in Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. J Ophthalmol. 2016; 2016: 7074016.
23. Skalicky SE, McAlinden C, Khatib T, et al. Activity Limitation in Glaucoma: Objective Assessment by the Cambridge Glaucoma Visual Function Test. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57: 6158-66.
24. Vold S, Ahmed, II, Craven ER, et al. Two-Year COMPASS Trial Results: Supraciliary Microstenting with Phacoemulsification in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataracts. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123: 2103-12.
25. Fea AM, Ahmed, II, Lavia C, et al. Hydrus microstent compared to selective laser trabeculoplasty in primary open angle glaucoma: one year results. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016.
26. Arriola-Villalobos P, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Diaz-Valle D, Morales-Fernandez L, Fernandez-Perez C and Garcia-Feijoo J. Glaukos iStent inject(R) Trabecular Micro-Bypass Implantation Associated with Cataract Surgery in Patients with Coexisting Cataract and Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Long-Term Study. J Ophthalmol. 2016; 2016: 1056573.
27. Seibold LK, Gamett KM, Kennedy JB, et al. Outcomes after combined phacoemulsification and trabecular microbypass stent implantation in controlled open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016; 42: 1332-8.
28. Ferguson TJ, Berdahl JP, Schweitzer JA and Sudhagoni RG. Clinical evaluation of a trabecular microbypass stent with phacoemulsification in
patients with open-angle glaucoma and cataract. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016; 10: 1767-73.
29. Ferguson TJ, Berdahl JP, Schweitzer JA and Sudhagoni R. Evaluation of a Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent in Pseudophakic Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2016; 25: 896-900.
30. Vold SD, Voskanyan L, Tetz M, et al. Newly Diagnosed Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Randomized to 2 Trabecular Bypass Stents or Prostaglandin: Outcomes Through 36 Months. Ophthalmol Ther. 2016; 5: 161-72.
31. Gonnermann J, Bertelmann E, Pahlitzsch M, Maier-Wenzel AB, Torun N and Klamann MK. Contralateral eye comparison study in MICS & MIGS: Trabectome(R) vs. iStent inject(R). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016.
32. Kerr NM, Kumar HK, Crowston JG and Walland MJ. Glaucoma laser and surgical procedure rates in Australia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016; 100: 1686-91.
33. De Keyser M, De Belder M and De Groot V. Randomized Prospective Study of the Use of Anti-Inflammatory Drops After Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty. J Glaucoma. 2016.
34. Geffen N, Ofir S, Belkin A, et al. Transscleral Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Without a Gonioscopy Lens. J Glaucoma. 2016.
35. Francis BA, Loewen N, Hong B, et al. Repeatability of selective laser trabeculoplasty for open-angle glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016; 16: 128.
36. Durr GM and Harasymowycz P. The effect of repeat 360-degree selective laser trabeculoplasty on intraocular pressure control in open-angle glaucoma. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2016; 39: 261-4.
37. Polat J, Grantham L, Mitchell K and Realini T. Repeatability of selective laser trabeculoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016; 100: 1437-41.
38. Zhang H, Yang Y, Xu J and Yu M. Selective laser trabeculoplasty in treating post-trabeculectomy advanced primary open-angle glaucoma. Exp Ther Med. 2016; 11: 1090-4.
39. Mansouri K and Shaarawy T. Comparing pattern scanning laser trabeculoplasty to selective laser trabeculoplasty: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016.
40. Ali Aljasim L, Owaidhah O and Edward DP. Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy: A Case-Control Study. J Glaucoma. 2016; 25: e253-8.
41. Kuchar S, Moster MR, Reamer CB and Waisbourd M. Treatment outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in advanced glaucoma. Lasers Med Sci. 2016; 31: 393-6.
42. Giannaccare G, Vagge A, Gizzi C, et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound treatment in patients with refractory glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016.
43. Aptel F, Denis P, Rouland JF, Renard JP and Bron A. Multicenter clinical trial of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment in glaucoma patients without previous filtering surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016; 94: e268-77.
44. Hollander DA, Pennesi ME and Alvarado JA. Management of plateau iris syndrome with cataract extraction and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation. Exp Eye Res. 2016.
45. Niwas SI, Lin W, Bai X, et al. Automated anterior segment OCT image analysis for Angle Closure Glaucoma mechanisms classification. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016; 130: 65-75.
46. Azuara-Blanco A, Burr J, Ramsay C, et al. Effectiveness of early lens extraction for the treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma (EAGLE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016; 388: 1389-97.
47. Bourne RR, Zhekov I and Pardhan S. Temporal ocular coherence tomography-measured changes in anterior chamber angle and diurnal intraocular pressure after laser iridoplasty: IMPACT study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016.
48. Narayanaswamy A, Baskaran M, Perera SA, et al. Argon Laser Peripheral Iridoplasty for Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123: 514-21.
49. Chang YF, Ko YC, Lau LI and Liu CJ. Verification of a formula developed to predict the postoperative intraocular pressure after cataract surgery in primary angle-closure glaucoma. J Chin Med Assoc. 2016; 79: 672-7.
50. Myers JS, Sall KN, DuBiner H, et al. A Dose-Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of 2 and 4 Weeks of Twice-Daily Ocular Trabodenoson in Adults with Ocular Hypertension or Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2016; 32: 555-62.
51. Bailey JN, Loomis SJ, Kang JH, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies TXNRD2, ATXN2 and FOXC1 as susceptibility loci for primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2016; 48: 189-94.
52. Khor CC, Do T, Jia H, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies five new susceptibility loci for primary angle closure glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2016; 48: 556-62.
53. Verma SS, Cooke Bailey JN, Lucas A, et al. Epistatic Gene-Based Interaction Analyses for Glaucoma in eMERGE and NEIGHBOR Consortium. PLoS Genet. 2016; 12: e1006186.
54. McDonnell F, Irnaten M, Clark AF, O’Brien CJ and Wallace DM. Hypoxia-Induced Changes in DNA Methylation Alter RASAL1 and TGFbeta1 Expression in Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0153354.
55. Khawaja AP, Cooke Bailey JN, Kang JH, et al. Assessing the Association of Mitochondrial Genetic Variation With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Using Gene-Set Analyses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57: 5046-52.
56. Venugopalan P, Wang Y, Nguyen T, Huang A, Muller KJ and Goldberg JL. Transplanted neurons integrate into adult retinas and respond to light. Nat Commun. 2016; 7: 10472.